p.s. There may also come a time when citizens may need to change the laws. Especially when politicians have become criminals. On Aug 8, 2011, at 1:58 PM, MarshaV wrote:
> > J-A, > > I think that RMP says somewhere that until you become a mystic, you had > better follow the laws. That makes sense to me. Break the law and you will > probably be punished. But I also think if you understand Quality, you are > less likely to cause the kind of harm that will put you behind bars. Why? > Because you will be more aware of betterment. > > > Marsha > > > > On Aug 8, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote: > >> Hi Marsha >> >> Is it possible to put personal responsiblílity upon a rock being a rock? >> Can you blame a squid for being a squid? >> Are the people on the Andaman Islands guilty for their culture? >> >> A person equal to the occasion with personal free will has his moral value >> concepts for what is right and wrong in his view but a kid that doesn't know >> all yet and is doing just what it is told can't be held responsible in the >> same way. Thats the difference between adults and infants. >> >> We are free to build our own personality or not. An adult individual is >> supposed to use his mental freedom. We are responsible for the moral we >> freely build by ourselves. We are responsible for the values that we freely >> can change by our own mind. Our moral values are our only property and >> nobody elses business unless we don't harm anyone else. >> >> Moral values that is not our own is not connected with free will. We can for >> example not be held responsible for race, color or sexual values. >> >> I can see that there is an interest by those who try to make us believe that >> there is no difference here wants us back to the sheep state so they can >> play the leaders. But why should we trust people that deny responsibility? >> >> Now I'm going to take a ride on my new horse. I got her cheap because they >> said she's nervous but I think she can dance. >> >> That's dynamic. >> >> Hoopla! >> >> Jan-Anders >> >> >> 8 aug 2011 kl. 17.31 MarshaV wrote: >> >>> The MoQ offers a four-tiered, evolutionary, hierarchical structure as a >>> moral framework. In what way does this translate into a logical and >>> necessary relationship between an agent with free will and moral >>> responsibility? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Aug 8, 2011, at 10:57 AM, MarshaV wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Is there a difference between the law holding someone responsible & >>>> protecting citizens from further harm and a individual being "morally >>>> responsible"? Just a question... >>>> >>> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
