Hello everyone On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi David and All, > > The statement that the "indefinable" is a synonym for freedom needs a little > tweaking. The indefinable can lead to more wrong conclusions than the > definable as exemplified in this computer age of rigid logic. >
Dan: Yes but it is the wrong conclusions, the tough junk, that lead to evolution in our thinking. Wrong conclusions are the hallmark of Dynamic Quality. "Actually, these last two piles, JUNK and TOUGH, were the piles that gave him the most concern. The whole thrust of the organizing effort was to have as few of these as possible. When they appeared he had to fight the tendency to slight them, shove them under the carpet, throw them out the window, belittle them, and forget them. "These were the underdogs, the outsiders, the pariahs, the sinners of his system. But the reason he was so concerned about them was that he felt the quality and strength of his entire system of organization depended on how he treated them. If he treated the pariahs well he would have a good system. If he treated them badly he would have a weak one. They could not be allowed to destroy all efforts at organization but he couldn't allow himself to forget them either. They just stood there, accusing, and he had to listen." [LILA] Dan comments: Wrong conclusions are the sins of knowledge. They are touch stones that tell us when we make a low quality assumption about reality. If we ignore them, there is a weak link in our system of organization. We learn by making mistakes, not by being correct. Thank you, Dan Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
