kinda confused, here Joe. did you just define DQ as a metaphysical principle AND undefinable? In the same sentence? maybe you've spent too much oxygen in choir practice and are feeling a bit dizzy. I know it makes me that way to read such self contradiction. But then, I realize that other people look at things differently. Myself, I think I'll stick with the pure realization that DQ is defined only in experience.
Take care, John On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > DQ is a metaphysical principle, indefinable, and there is no metaphysical > reality for DQ in definition e.g., emotions. The failure is the attitude > in > logical discourse that everything must be defined like in mathematics, > Imho. > > Joe > > > On 8/12/11 11:39 AM, "Dan Glover" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We define the undefined all the time. We could say the process of > > awareness is that process of defining. When we discover we've failed > > to define some thing properly (a wrong conclusion) we're momentarily > > at a loss. That sense of loss is the beginning response to Dynamic > > Quality that leads to greater knowledge. > > > > In "echoing" John you are echoing a wrong conclusion. Perhaps it is an > > opportunity for you both to learn from it... or not. > > > > Thank you, > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
