Marsha to dmb:

You think it, therefore it's true. What James argues still means nothing to 
me.I put them in the same category as God.

What is your argument?  Have you presented any argument at all?  No?  Are you 
folding?

Andre:
Your antics, Lucy, remind me of the following Zen story:

Nan-in, a Japanese master during the Meiji era (1868-1912), received a university professor who came to inquire about Zen.

Nan-in served tea. He poured his visitor's cup full, and then kept on pouring.

The professor watched the overflow until he no longer could restrain himself. "It is overfull. No more will go in!"

"Like this cup," Nan-in said, "you are full of your own opinions and speculations. How can I show you Zen unless you first empty your cup?"

Marsha:
The interesting question is how do you lessen the attachment to static quality to become more free.

Andre:
It's all in the story, Lucy and perhaps you could take lesson from your 
grandson's observation.

Alternatively you could follow Pirsig's advice:" You free yourself from static 
patterns by putting them to sleep. That is, you master them with such proficiency that 
they become an unconscious part of your nature. You get so used to them you completely 
forget them and they are gone. There in the center of the most monotonous boredom of 
static ritualistic patterns the Dynamic Quality is found" (LILA, p 393)

Your problem Lucy, is that you do not take sq seriously. You continuously argue 
they are illusions. You fight them so much that you keep them awake. They are 
monsters to you, nuisances, scary apparitions because, despite what you say, 
they are very, very real to you.

You keep on confusing sq with DQ. That is the heart of your difficulty. You 
reduce sq to illusions because they have no inherent existence. We all know 
they do not have inherent existence but that does not mean we should treat them 
as not real or meaningful or helpful. Your attack on sq has confined itself to 
nihilistic drivel and the story above may teach you that there is a large 
amount of ego tripping and narcissism in there as well (which you project on 
others here on the MD and, I presume, the rest of the world).

If I were you I should be very grateful to my grandson.

And, anticipating your response: of course THIS IS ONLY MY OPINION!







Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to