Hi Mark,

Nowhere did I state that "this physics stuff" is all Reality, and I understand 
'analogy' full well.  With your statement "... Free Will is Real because it is 
Real."  I might wonder if you understand analogy.  -  Neither of us know 
directly why RMP was put into the hospital, but it might be safe to say it was 
not just trivial omelette-making.  And what does losing ones mind Really mean?  
That's a question maybe you can answer.  -  Instead of theoretical physic, 
maybe I should have wished to study the philosophy of physics with a specialty 
in quantum metaphysics?  But to be honest, I think I should have studied 
communications.  


Marsha  




On Oct 1, 2011, at 11:33 PM, 118 wrote:

> Yes, the math is always being rewritten, as a MoQer this should not surprise 
> you.  It is all sq being used to depict reality, and as such it is a creation 
> of man.  Unless you understand what the word "analogy" means, you will not 
> understand what MoQ is.  Reread the end of ZaMM.  Pisig lost his "mind" for a 
> reason, it was not just trivial Logic.  He is trying to explain what happened 
> to him.  If you buy all this physics stuff as Reality, then you need to 
> reconsider your reason for liking MoQ, IMHO.
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Sep 29, 2011, at 7:48 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> NYT: 
>> 
>> 
>> The physics world is abuzz with news that a group of European physicists 
>> plans to announce Friday that it has clocked a burst of subatomic particles 
>> known as neutrinos breaking the cosmic speed limit — the speed of light — 
>> that was set by Albert Einstein in 1905.
>> 
>> If true, it is a result that would change the world. But that “if” is 
>> enormous.
>> 
>> Even before the European physicists had presented their results — in a paper 
>> that appeared on the physics Web site arXiv.org on Thursday night and in a 
>> seminar at CERN, the European Center for Nuclear Research, on Friday — a 
>> chorus of physicists had risen up on blogs and elsewhere arguing that it was 
>> way too soon to give up on Einstein and that there was probably some 
>> experimental error. Incredible claims require incredible evidence.
>> 
>> 
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/23/science/23speed.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=neutrinos&st=cse
>> 
>> ___
>> 


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to