Hi Steve and all, I observe that an indefinable emotional perception DQ, indefinable reality, must be manifest though indefinable in the conceptual intellectual awareness, SQ. I describe evolution as levels in existence? Kiss! How does error enter this picture?
Intellectual definitions enable logical discourse better than indefinable emotional perceptions of reality. A nod to better discourse for proof! SQ definition, intellect, manifests reality in defined communication, reaching beyond an individual emotional perception of indefinable DQ reality, making verification logical and reasonable. Two heads are better than one. Our emotions are indefinable DQ. How are defined concepts, the intellectual level, a higher order of reality SQ? Laws (concepts) determine our behavior. The level of action, e.g., creation by artists, manifests beyond the emotional perception of indefinable DQ good. Intellectual defined reality is a higher order in conception than emotional indefinable reality. Is this the enigma that the concept of hierarchical evolution can resolve in an emotional/intellectual cacophony of consciousness? Joe On 10/24/11 6:41 AM, "Steven Peterson" <[email protected]> wrote: > Steve: > You are objecting to my claim based on the glasses metaphor that DQ > "is what it is regardless of what we think about it." That's not what > I said. I said "OUR RELATIONSHIP to DQ is what it is" regardless of > our concepts. It is what the MOQ says it is, i.e. the first division > of Quality is DQ/sq. I agree that it is our concepts that can be good > or bad, and I've been saying that all along. (The problem is not a > matter of being our of touch with reality but of needing better > concepts.) Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
