On Nov 11, 2011, at 8:32 AM, X Acto wrote:
>
> To all,
>
> Hagan:
>
> "Consciousness is nothing more than the splitting of Reality into this and
> that. "
>
> Marsha:
> Not this, not that...
>
> Ron:
> This concludes then that "UN-consciouness" is what all life is striving
> towards if
> "Not this, not that" accurately describes the nature of DQ in the most
> general terms.
>
> Which seems to conflict with the idea that intellectual quality is the most
> moral form
> of Quality.
Marsha:
Intellectual patterns would be the highest form of static quality, but
While sustaining biological and social patterns
Kill all intellectual patterns.
Kill them completely
And then follow Dynamic Quality
And morality will be served.
It seems to me that to follow DQ would be of even higher value.
> Ron:
> Also it seems to conflict with the idea that DQ is "everchanging" for change
> is making
> the conscious splitting from past to present into "this and that".
Marsha:
Dynamic Quality is indeterminate. It promotes change in static quality, but
is,
in conventional terms, itself indivisible, undefinable and unknowable. If you
are
going to assign some absolute meaning to "not this, not that" you've missed the
point.
> Ron:
> Therefore I have my doubts as to the effective use of the term "not this, not
> that" as the best
> general understanding of DQ.
Marsha:
If the expression doesn't work for you, don't use it. But I'd like to know if
you are suggesting
there is suppose to be a one-size-fits-all general understanding? How would
that be
determined? Are you going to chase everybody who disagrees with you off this
list and
then come to an agreement?
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
