> Ron:
> Also it seems to conflict with the idea that DQ is "everchanging" for change
> is making
> the conscious splitting from past to present into "this and that".
Marsha:
Dynamic Quality is indeterminate. It promotes change in static quality, but
is,
in conventional terms, itself indivisible, undefinable and unknowable. If you
are
going to assign some absolute meaning to "not this, not that" you've missed the
point.
> Ron:
> Therefore I have my doubts as to the effective use of the term "not this, not
> that" as the best
> general understanding of DQ.
Marsha:
If the expression doesn't work for you, don't use it. But I'd like to know if
you are suggesting
there is suppose to be a one-size-fits-all general understanding? How would
that be
determined? Are you going to chase everybody who disagrees with you off this
list and
then come to an agreement?
Ron:
"Not this, not that" directly refers to the more general meaning of DQ as "the
good".
Intellectually The Good is nothing in particular but some things ARE better
than others.
What makes some things better than others is the driving force of existence it
is the
basic creative idea of life. Therefore focus on what is best out weighs and has
greater
meaning than the rejection of particulars.
Some ideas are better than others, static patterns of marsha, those who leave
can't explain
their reasons as to why their concepts are better than others so they mask that
inabilty with
rhetorical games evasion and defensive posturing.
Often those with large egos have a hard time dealing with it and choose to
leave over reflecting
on their reasons for their beliefs.
..
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
