Mark to Andre: One cannot say that emotions are not the same Thing as Quality since Quality is not definable as such. Neither are emotions, since the static labels for it are not the emotions. We must look to causes, and not confuse them with effects. Static representation is an effect.
Andre: Hi Mark, I thought that this whole cause-and-effect thing is re-interpreted from the MOQ perspective. Mark: Just because emotions result in definitions does not make them the definitions, does it? Andre: I do not follow your 'logic' here Mark. It doesn't make sense to me at all. Mark: If that were true, we would be trapped in sq, which we are not. Andre: We ARE the patterns Mark, capable of apprehending Dynamic Quality. Mark: My arguments are well within the bounds of MoQ, but perhaps you can see a flaw in my logic. Andre: With all due respect Mark, I wouldn't know where to start. I apologize but I do not have the time nor energy nor inclination required to follow this through. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
