Hi Horse,  

Thank-you. Indeed it is only DQ left out.

-David.  


On Saturday, 10 March 2012 at 11:07 PM, Horse wrote:

> Hi David
>  
> I don't often send through 'me too' posts but I thought I should do so  
> on this one.
> You get to the core of the MoQ in a simple and easy to understand way.
> (Static) Patterns (of value) are the means by which we make sense of  
> (order) our experience and, consequently, how we reason.
> Only DQ is left out!
>  
> Thank you
>  
> Horse
>  
> On 10/03/2012 00:58, David Harding wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >  
> > That's the core of our disagreement. The fact that you do not see the 
> > beauty in Pirsig's choice of the word 'patterns' and think that his 
> > selection of the word is rather arbitrary and that "he could have used 
> > other terms".
> >  
> > From the perspective of the MOQ the correct answer is the best one. 
> > Wouldn't you agree? I think so... So I think an explanation of the MOQ 
> > which has beauty in Pirsig's use of the word 'patterns' is better than one 
> > in which his selection of this word is arbitrary. A beautiful idea has 
> > harmony with our experience and the MOQ is the most harmonious explanation 
> > of our general experience ever created. It's for this reason that I don't 
> > think that the choice of the term 'patterns' is as arbitrary as you imply.
> >  
> > The reason there is beauty in the term 'patterns' is because that is how 
> > our intellect works. It inductively recognises patterns and designates 
> > these patterns names. Pirsig has said as much in Zen and the Art of 
> > Motorcycle Maintenance:
> >  
> > "This morning I talked about hierarchies of thought...the system. Now I 
> > want to talk about methods of finding one's way through these 
> > hierarchies...logic.
> >  
> > Two kinds of logic are used, inductive and deductive. Inductive inferences 
> > start with observations of the machine and arrive at general conclusions. 
> > For example, if the cycle goes over a bump and the engine misfires, and 
> > then goes over another bump and the engine misfires, and then goes over 
> > another bump and the engine misfires, and then goes over a long smooth 
> > stretch of road and there is no misfiring, and then goes over a fourth bump 
> > and the engine misfires again, one can logically conclude that the 
> > misfiring is caused by the bumps. That is induction: reasoning from 
> > particular experiences to general truths."
> >  
> > Our minds inductively create hierarchies of thought through this logical 
> > detection of patterns. That's it. That's all there is to it.
> >  
> > If, on the other hand, we use these patterns we have created to deduce 
> > something not directly experienced, then that is a deductive inference...
> >  
> > "Deductive inferences do the reverse. They start with general knowledge and 
> > predict a specific observation. For example, if, from reading the hierarchy 
> > of facts about the machine, the mechanic knows the horn of the cycle is 
> > powered exclusively by electricity from the battery, then he can logically 
> > infer that if the battery is dead the horn will not work. That is 
> > deduction."
> >  
> > You might now be saying.. "but then if Pirsig's choice of the term 
> > 'patterns' has been selected because of its intellectual component, why do 
> > we call them inorganic, biological and social 'patterns'? "
> >  
> > The reason we call them this is because they are only ever recognised as 
> > patterns *because* of our intellect. They only exist *because* of our 
> > intellect. The recognition of this fact is built in right there in their 
> > name.
> >  
> > -David.
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > On Saturday, 10 March 2012 at 1:43 AM, 118 wrote:
> >  
> > > Hi David,
> > > My guess is that it fit within the rhetoric of the chapter. I am sure he 
> > > could have used other terms. The point is that it is just a word. 
> > > "Things" do not really exist as patterns, that is a word he chose at the 
> > > time. If one wants to say that patterns is the most enlightening term to 
> > > use for presentation it should be explained. To me it sounds like 
> > > mathematical formula. As such it leaves a lot out.
> > >  
> > > Encapsulation of the understanding of a book to a single word seems (to 
> > > me) to dismiss the message.
> > >  
> > > Cheers, and thanks for the question.
> > >  
> > > Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
> > > Mark
> > >  
> > > On Mar 9, 2012, at 6:04 AM, David Harding<[email protected] 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> > >  
> > > > Hi Mark,
> > > >  
> > > > As an aside to our ongoing conversation. I'd like to have another..
> > > >  
> > > > Why do you think things are called 'patterns' in the MOQ?
> > > >  
> > > > The values part is pretty self explanatory.
> > > >  
> > > > But why did Pirsig use the term patterns?
> > > >  
> > > > -David.
> > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > > > Archives:
> > > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > > > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> > > >  
> > >  
> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > > Archives:
> > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> > >  
> >  
> >  
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >  
>  
>  
> --  
>  
> "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production 
> deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid."
> — Frank Zappa
>  
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>  
>  


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to