Greetings,
On Mar 18, 2012, at 5:16 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > "Dynamic Quality is defined constantly by everyone. Consciousness can be > described is a process of defining Dynamic Quality. But once the definitions > emerge, they are static patterns and no longer apply to Dynamic Quality. So > one can say correctly that Dynamic Quality is both infinitely definable and > undefinable because definition never exhausts it." > (Lila's Child) > > "Moreover, Nagarjuna (1966, p.251) shares Pirsig’s perception that the > indeterminate (or Dynamic) is the fundamental nature of the conditioned (or > static)..." > (MoQ Textbook) > > "Form is emptiness, emptiness is form. Form is not other than emptiness; > emptiness is not other than form." > (Heart Sutra) > > Marsha: > Static quality is not other than Dynamic Quality; Dynamic Quality is not > other than static quality. > >>>> Dan: >>>> Seeing static patterns of quality as ever-changing >>>> and impermanent seems to go against Robert Pirsig's notion that it is >>>> best to find a balance between Dynamic Quality and static quality. Marsha: Dan, maybe this is RMP's notion of balance; to know sq/DQ as the same. Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
