Marsha said:
Andre's cryptic little equations without full quoted statements AND without
exact posts referenced is a little defensive game that I have no intentions of
playing.
Marsha quoted Pirsig:
"The MOQ divides the hominem, or “individual,” into four parts: inorganic,
biological, social and intellectual. Once this analysis is made, the ad hominem
argument can be defined more clearly: it is an attempt to destroy the
intellectual patterns of an individual by attacking his social status. In other
words, a lower form of evolution is being used to destroy a higher form. That
is evil..." (LILA's Child)
dmb says:
This is just more evidence that you no business here, Marsha. You can't even
see that our arguments and objections count as such. When reasoned arguments
and textual evidence is presented, you dismiss it as a game, a trick, a lie or
a personal attack. And so the objections are never properly acknowledged, let
alone answered or addressed. Instead of replying to the objections, you simply
repeat the objectionable nonsense over and over. This has gone on for years!
This is not what fair and reasonable people do, Marsha. How do you explain or
justify this behavior to yourself? You really can't see how there might be
something wrong here? Seriously?!
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
