Hi Mark, Imho There is one meaning for cognition which follows a logic for physical reality dependent on mathematical logic for verification, physics.
There is a further meaning in cognition which accepts DQ/SQ metaphysics. Evolution is beyond mathematical physics. Mathematics a lower level can not verify the higher level metaphysics. The defined vocabulary of mathematics is inadequate. DQ/SQ metaphysics is proposed as indefinable/definable reality evolution. The appeal to DQ/SQ, levels in existence, is beyond mathematics. Evolution defines logic in verifying levels in existence, metaphysics. DQ/SQ metaphysics accepts verification for evolutionary levels in existence. There is no physically describable manifestation which verifies this definition of observable evolution. A metaphysical format accepts indefinable reality DQ, in evolution DQ/SQ. DQ/SQ is the cognitive description of evolution which embraces the metaphysical logic of levels in existence. Evolution describes a reality beyond the one size fits all logic of mathematics. Joe On 3/23/12 10:06 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > If everything is cognitive, then how does one follow DQ? You say "well that > is a cognitive argument", and I say "no, it is dependent drift", and the > conversation becomes totally meaningless. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
