The thougt



On Mar 24, 2012, at 1:06 AM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> No, to "think so" does not require the cognitive process.  You are entangled 
> in the same paradox that David is, I believe.  If one remains only in the 
> static world then there is so much missed, in my opinion.  Just consider your 
> "think so" as a paradox which does not have much use.  There are plenty of 
> paradoxes that are useless, like "everything you know is false".  This is 
> just logic feeding on itself.  What you present is a circular logic which has 
> no escape. Zeno also proved that nothing moved, but this is useless from an 
> intuitive point of view.
> 
> I could say that what you say is not your own but dependent on pre-existing 
> conditions, and thereby state that the cognitive process is only reflexive, 
> therefore there is no cognition at all, but only "drift".  This would also be 
> a senseless argument in the face of DQ.  
> 
> If everything is cognitive, then how does one follow DQ?  You say "well that 
> is a cognitive argument", and I say "no, it is dependent drift", and the 
> conversation becomes totally meaningless.
> 
> In Zen there is the concept of "thinking" without thinking.  Give it a try, 
> it may open up new "understandings" for you.
> 
> This is of course just my opinion and you do not have to agree with it, as I 
> do not of yours.  Just ask yourself how intuitive is this cognitive process 
> that you claim is everything.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
> Mark
> 
> On Mar 23, 2012, at 8:53 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 23, 2012, at 7:05 PM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Marsha,
>>> I believe that much can be apprehended outside of the cognitive process.  I 
>>> would hazard to say that 99% of our apprehension is outside of such 
>>> cognition.  How much does your body go through In an hour?  How much of 
>>> that reaches the cognitive process.
>> 
>> To think so requires the cognitive process.  
>> 
>> 
>>> We cannot strictly separate ourselves from the environment, but when we do, 
>>> that is the cognitive process.  When is each molecule part of ourselves or 
>>> part of the environment (for example)?
>> 
>> To think this requires the cognitive process.  
>> 
>> 
>>> To claim that all must first pass through the cognitive process before it. 
>>> Is ours, is to deny the dynamic as part of our experience, in my opinion.  
>>> But, I may be wrong (again).
>> 
>> To think this requires the cognitive process.  None of your opinion can be 
>> apprehended apart from your cognitive process.
>> 
>> 
>>> Sent laboriously from an iPhone,
>>> Mark
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 23, 2012, at 2:49 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Craig,
>>>> 
>>>> I am not saying patterns are mere ideas, but can anything at all be 
>>>> apprehended apart from one's complex of cognitive processes?  Not a 
>>>> universe, not billions-of-years, not humans, and not advanced 
>>>> civilizations.  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 1:26 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> In regard to "ideas, which produce what we know as matter":
>>>>> it should be remembered how insignificant humans might be.
>>>>> Firstly, the universe existed billions of years before humans & if humans 
>>>>> demise, might exist billions of years after.
>>>>> Secondly, there might be civilizations way more advanced than us, that 
>>>>> make us look primitive. 
>>>>> Craig
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>> Archives:
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to