Tuukka said to dmb:
I don't have time for this bullshit. You posted an useful article, I wanted to
thank you for that. I guess I just couldn't believe you actually do think it's
good to reject positive things other people give, such as respect. I'm not
interested in playing your game, because it is not relevant practice for my
work. I was interested in the article you posted. You were useful for me, but
in a way which you did not intend, and now you seem to say this implies that
I'm stupid. Talk about drivel.
dmb says:
You'll forgive me if I doubt the sincerity of your "respect" for my irrelevant
bullshit games.
And do you really think I'm going to suddenly take a liking to bad ideas just
because somebody flatters me? I think that would be super sleazy and profoundly
dishonest.
The complaint was that you don't get the core concept and I guess it would be
fair to say this implies a charge of stupidity. I realize that isn't very nice
but how does it fail to be accurate? The accusation seems just as true now,
even after two more replies from you. The best way to dispute this charge is
simply to show that you do get the core concept. Can you do that? You certainly
haven't and I'm honestly not sure if you can. It seems that most people would
be very keen to INTELLIGENTLY dispute the charge of stupidity.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
