Ron asks:
Is Quality a Monism? firstly, it should be clear we are speaking of static quality and when we are speaking of monads we are speaking about unity, oneness, whole. It tends to lend to the idea of completeness. Andre: It seems to me that DQ (on its own) is not, as you suggest unity, oneness, whole. Sq is, for the same reason not unity, oneness, whole. No, both are (Dq/sq). The simple reasoning being: how do you know unity, oneness, whole? They are static conceptions...and how are you aware of DQ except from a static point of view? (snip) To just continue Ron, for a small bit...in this conventional, static world the 'idea of completeness" shall remain an idea. All is provisional and shall..in time and space...remain representations (sq). Ron replies: Thats a great philosophical question Andre, "how do you know unity,oneness,whole?" you said we know them statically, which feels like the right direction. Quality then is the primary explanitory factor in our philosophical theories and in this way we can say that Quality is one because it is the basis and begining on which all explanation extends. But That is probably the only way I'd say that Quality is "one". thnx Andre ,, Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
