Hi Ron, Perhaps a better question would be: How do we know differentiation?
This may answer your question as to how we know oneness. Sent laboriously from an iPhone, Mark On Jun 30, 2012, at 7:15 PM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ron asks: > > Is Quality a Monism? firstly, it should be clear we are speaking of static > quality and when we are speaking of monads we are speaking about unity, > oneness, whole. > It tends to lend to the idea of completeness. > > Andre: > It seems to me that DQ (on its own) is not, as you suggest unity, oneness, > whole. Sq is, for the same reason not unity, oneness, whole. No, both are > (Dq/sq). The simple reasoning being: how do you know unity, oneness, whole? > They are static conceptions...and how are you aware of DQ except from a > static point of view? > (snip) > To just continue Ron, for a small bit...in this conventional, static world > the 'idea of completeness" shall remain an idea. All is provisional and > shall..in time and space...remain representations (sq). > > Ron replies: > Thats a great philosophical question Andre, "how do you know > unity,oneness,whole?" > you said we know them statically, which feels like the right direction. > Quality then is the > primary explanitory factor in our philosophical theories and in this way we > can say that > Quality is one because it is the basis and begining on which all explanation > extends. > But That is probably the only way I'd say that Quality is "one". > > thnx Andre > > > > > ,, > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
