dmb,

I explained that the quote you presented (see below) was NOT something I wrote. 
 That disposed of your mythical contradiction.  Besides I didn't state that 
'truth' was wrong, or bad or didn't exist.  I wrote that I find the idea of 
'truth' insignificant and uninteresting, and preferred to call static patterns 
of value 'patterns' and consider them hypothetical.  Further, I am not 
insisting, nor even suggesting, that you, or anyone, adopt my position, though 
I find holding patterns as hypothetical is conducive to an open, inquiring 
mind.  I'll once again present the reasons for my choice:

Truth is an intellectual static pattern of value, but I have nothing to say 
about 'truth'. Rather than label static patterns of value as 'truth', I prefer 
to think of objects of knowledge (patterns) as hypothetical.  Once one accepts 
the MoQ's fundamental principal that the world is nothing but Value, then 
'expanded rationality' occurs when an individual transforms the natural 
tendency to reify self and world into the natural tendency to hold all static 
patterns of value to be hypothetical (supposed but not neccesarily real or 
true.)  By using 'hypothetical' I think there is less of a tendency toward 
intellectual arrogance.  Understanding static (patterned) value as hypothetical 
acknowledges the incompleteness of what we know and makes room for additional 
inquiry with new possibilities; it promotes an attitude of fearless curiosity: 
gumption.  It moves one away from thinking of entities as existing inherently 
and independent of consciousness. 

There is no contradiction and nothing for me to defend.


Marsha 




On Aug 22, 2012, at 1:12 AM, MarshaV wrote:

> Hi dmb,
> 
>> "I value the MOQ's idea that the world in nothing but value (DQ/sq): there 
>> is nothing additional called static intellectual value."
> 
> 
> This was not a quote from moi.  I wrote:
> 
> "I value the MoQ's idea that the world is nothing but Value (DQ/sq); there is 
> nothing additional called 'truth'.
> 
> Truth is an intellectual static pattern of value, but I have nothing to say 
> about 'truth'. Rather than label static patterns of value as 'truth', I 
> prefer to think of objects of knowledge (patterns) as hypothetical.  Once one 
> accepts the MoQ's fundamental principal that the world is nothing but Value, 
> then 'expanded rationality' occurs when an individual transforms the natural 
> tendency to reify self and world into the natural tendency to hold all static 
> patterns of value to be hypothetical (supposed but not neccesarily real or 
> true.)  By using 'hypothetical' I think there is less of a tendency toward 
> intellectual arrogance.  Understanding static (patterned) value as 
> hypothetical acknowledges the incompleteness of what we know and makes room 
> for additional inquiry with new possibilities; it promotes an attitude of 
> fearless curiosity: gumption.  It moves one away from thinking of entities as 
> existing inherently and independent of consciousness. 
> 
> Static patterns of value are repetitive processes, conditionally 
> co-dependent, impermanent and ever-changing, that pragmatically tend to 
> persist and change within a stable, predictable pattern.  Within the MoQ, 
> these patterns are morally categorized into a four-level, evolutionary, 
> hierarchical structure:  inorganic, biological, social and intellectual. 
> Static quality exists in stable patterns relative to other patterns. Patterns 
> have no independent, inherent existence.  Further, these patterns 
> pragmatically exist relative to an individual's static pattern of life 
> history.
> 
> Dynamic Quality is not divisible, not definable and not knowable, though it 
> can be experienced.
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> 
> Marsha
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to