Hijacking a thread by changing the subject is hardly respect, Ron ?
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:30 PM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote: > Ian had submitted: > > > From yesterday's BBC R4 In Our Time - on the ontological argument for god. > > QUOTE > The Ontological Argument is quite a way down the list of subjects with > which I would have thought I would get absorbed. But I did. The notion > of a medieval Benedictine monk from Italy, via France, becoming > Archbishop of Canterbury and sitting down to compose through logic > alone a proof for the existence of God, and both proving it to the > satisfaction of some people and not proving it to the satisfaction of > others, was extremely seductive. ... > > The thing about other worlds of knowledge is that the more you examine > them and the more you get to know them, the more respect you have for > them. It doesn't matter very much whether they seem to be way off-key > when compared with "modern" knowledge or information. > UNQUOTE > > [Ron comments] > I noticed an article that modern science is close to ruling out the existence > of God. I thought, what a stupid article! What a loaded comment! > > It all depends on what you mean by the term "God" > > Through examination and rendering other worlds of knowledge more > intelligible, we can better grasp it's meaning, it's value. > > .. > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
