dmb,
Why don't you present a topic you're actually willing discuss? Where's that
thesis you wrote? Did you present an independent thought in your thesis? Did
you include RMP's statement:
"The Metaphysics of Quality is not intended to be within any philosophic
tradition, although obviously it was not written in a vacuum. My first
awareness that it resembled James' work came from a magazine review long after
“Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance” was published. The Metaphysics of
Quality's central idea that the world is nothing but value is not part of any
philosophic tradition that I know of. I have proposed it because it seems to me
that when you look into it carefully it makes more sense than all the other
things the world is supposed to be composed of. One particular strength lies in
its applicability to quantum physics, where substance has been dismissed but
nothing except arcane mathematical formulae has really replaced it."
...
"... If, as has been noted by R.C. Zaehner, once the Oxford University
Professor of Eastern Religions and Ethics, I am saying the same thing as
Aristotle; and if, as has been noted in the Harvard Educational Review, I am
saying the same thing as William James; and if as has been noted now that I may
be saying the same thing as Spinoza: then why has no one ever noticed that
Aristotle and Spinoza and William James are all saying the same thing?"
(RMP,'A brief summary of the Metaphysics of Quality', 2005)
Marsha
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
