And Nietzsche is pale compared to Max Stirner (who influenced Nietzsche). A generation before N., S. had launched an attack on anything SQ in morals, and possibly in epistemology too.

The work states the individual is dominated by illusory concepts ('fixed ideas' or 'spooks'), which can be shaken and undermined by each individual in order for that person to act fully. These concepts include primarilyreligion <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion>andideology <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology>, and the institutions claiming authority over the individual. According to him, not only isGod <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God>analienating <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marx%27s_theory_of_alienation>ideal, asFeuerbach <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Feuerbach>had argued in/The Essence of Christianity <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Essence_of_Christianity>/(1841), but so too are humanity itself,nationalism <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalism>and allideologies <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology>. According to Stirner, individuals should only entertain temporary associations between themselves, agreeing in mutual aid and cooperation for a period of time, but only when in each individual's interest (perhaps anticipatingcooperative games <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative_games>) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ego_and_Its_Own


MRB

On 11/25/2012 11:11 AM, david buchanan wrote:
Pirsig isn't the only one who opposes the belief in a fixed and eternal 
Truth....

‎"You want to know what the philosophers' idiosyncrasies are? Their lack of historical sense 
for one thing, their hatred of the very idea of becoming, their Egypticity. They think that they 
are showing respect for something when they dehistoricize it, sub specie aeterni,―when they turn it 
into a mummy. For thousands of years, philosophers have been using only mummified concepts: nothing 
real makes it through their hands alive. They kill and stuff things they worship, these lords of 
concept idolatry―they become mortal dangers to everything they worship. They see death, change, and 
age, as well as procreation and growth, as objections,―refutations even. What is, does not become; 
what becomes, is not...So they all believe, desperately even, in being. But since they cannot get 
hold of it, they look for reasons why it is kept from them. 'There must be some deception here, 
some illusory level of appearances preventing us from perceiving things that have being: where is 
the deceiver?'―'We've got it!' they shout in ecstasy, 'it is in sensibility! These senses that are 
so immoral anyway, now they are deceiving us about the true world. Moral: get rid of 
sense-deception, becoming, history, lies,―history is nothing but a belief in the senses, a belief 
in lies. Moral: say no to everyone who believes in the senses, to all the rest of humanity: they 
are all "rabble". Be a philosopher, be a mummy, put on your gravedigger's face and show 
the world what monotono-theism is all about!―And above all, get rid of the body, this miserable 
idée fixe of the senses! full of all the errors of logic, refuted, impossible even, although it is 
impudent enough to act as if it were real!...'" - Friedrich Nietzsche                          
             

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to