[DMB]
But you already know this. You're just showing the trolls what an actual 
conversation would look like. Thanks for that.

[Arlo]
Well not entirely :-)...

Backup: I've had some recent conversations that have left me thinking that when 
I've been using the word "experience" some people (not here) hear 
"observation". And it made me realize that I need to be careful when talking 
outside of other people's metaphysical perspectives that when a word is 
'shared' it can lead to false agreement. So I've been rethinking how I say 
things that foreground 'experience' not as a passive, observational response, 
but as an active, lived moment. 

Tangental Tie-in: I've also be working an activity theoretical response to the 
learning theory notion of 'conceptual change', and have been drawing on 
Vygotsky's notions of 'knowledge' ('everyday' versus 'scientific'), as well as 
broader socio-cultural works (such as Gal'perin's ideas on systemic-theoretical 
instruction) and, of course, Pirsig and Dewey.

So, a part of this became evaluating 'scientific knowledge' (in Vygotskian 
language) as Pirsig's 'intellectual patterns of value' based on (as you have 
said) "explanatory power or predictive power" in the context of affordances to 
human agency. That is, emphasizing the connection to lived 
experience-as-activity (Pirsig/Dewey) rather than an abstract/passive 
experience-as-observation (Vygotsky cautioned that scientific knowledge that 
became detached from human activity becomes reduced to what he calls 
"verbalism"). 

I know I'm not saying anything new to you, this was an audience unfamiliar with 
these concepts, so if it seems "101" here, keep in mind I'm only giving you 
context.

So, I was asking because I wanted to make sure that my tying 
"affordances/agency" as a component to pragmatic truth, and that evaluations as 
high/low quality of these patterns based, in part, on affordances/agency was 
(at least in this context) okay. 

But you're welcome anyway :-).



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to