On Jan 10, 2013, at 12:47 AM, MarshaV wrote to Ron, Xacto, X:
Really, X, there may be available more than one explanation of both 'concern'
and 'value'. If you are pointing to the Value as in the statement "The world
is nothing but Value which can be experienced as patterned (static) /
unpatterned (Dynamic), in other words, the MoQ.", then I might remind you that
Value comes before any 'concerns with value' that you might conceptualize.
On Jan 9, 2013, at 9:23 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> X,
>
> What kind of concerns do you have?
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2013, at 4:01 PM, X <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> When someone makes the blanket statement "it's all an analogy" with all the
>> finality
>> of a question well answered, inquiring minds aren't as easily satisfied.
>> Because those
>> who are concerned with value need more of an explanation of just what one
>> means
>> by "analogy" for it posesses several meanings.
>> .
>>
>> ..But then again, smug quips of finality are all some here seek.
>>
>>
>> ..
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
