Hi All
Wouldn't it be better to define self, as distinct from other, from
within different frameworks?
In a subject/object framework you have definitions based upon either a
subjective or objective point of view and from within a MoQ framework
you have static patterns emerging in response to Dynamic Quality.
Neither is 'correct' as they are dependent upon the overall framework
currently employed. Trying to shoe-horn one set of patterns into the
other framework results in confusion.
The beauty of the MoQ lies in the dispensing of subjects and objects, in
favour of an emergent self as a response to Dynamic Quality. Reflection
upon 'Self' becomes an Intellectual pattern. The intellectual pattern of
self responds to Dynamic Quality which creates a new intellectual
pattern - distinct from, but related to, the prior pattern.
Horse
On 29/01/2013 18:42, X wrote:
Don't like your analogy
Using my own
Didn't think you'd mind.
Guessin that if the self doesent exist
One can hardly be expected to reflect
.
MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
Greetings X-man and dmb,
Here's my definition of the self: the “self” is a flow of ever-changing,
conditionally co-dependent and impermanent static patterns value in the
infinite field of Dynamic Quality.
Marsha
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
--
"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines
or dates by which bills must be paid."
— Frank Zappa
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
