The tetralemma can be addressed in this way We ask if the concept has meaning if it has value. If it has value we can say it exists.
MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >On Jan 29, 2013, at 7:21 PM, MarshaV wrote: > >But, X-man and dmb, > >the definition in the previous post (below) represents a static >interpretation, Ultimately: > >One cannot say that the self exists. >One cannot say that the self does not exist. >One cannot say that self both exists and does not exist. >One cannot say that the self neither exists nor does not exist. > > > >Marsha > > >------------- > > >On Jan 28, 2013, at 11:56 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >Greetings X-man and dmb, > >Here's my definition of the self: the “self” is a flow of ever-changing, >conditionally co-dependent and impermanent static patterns value in the >infinite field of Dynamic Quality. > > >Marsha > > > >___ > > >Moq_Discuss mailing list >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >Archives: >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
