That's right Jan. If it has value it exists.
It starts with your own hands and heart.
It starts with yourself. 

.


Jan Anders Andersson <[email protected]> wrote:

>Sure Marsha
>
>Being "nothing but Value" does not mean that it is worthless.
>
>J A
>
>3 feb 2013 kl. 10.29 skrev MarshaV:
>
>> 
>> J-A,
>> 
>> Save the Robert DeNiro impersonation...  
>> 
>> Metaphysics is the investigation into the nature of reality.  The 
>> Metaphysics of Quality has as its fundamental principle the idea that the 
>> world is nothing but value.  
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Feb 3, 2013, at 4:20 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear Marsha
>>> 
>>> Who do you look at in the mirror? Some One else?
>>> 
>>> I am talking to You. 
>>> 
>>> Being someone can be a pleasure or a suffering inferno, it all depends on 
>>> how well we learn how to do it. By excellence or without balance.
>>> 
>>> MOQ is about things, living organisms, social group identities and 
>>> paradigms. They all have a dynamic (time related) and a static (almost 
>>> permanent) quality side.
>>> 
>>> The whole thing is "to be", or not to be.
>>> 
>>> There is always something out there that is - phantastic. You'll see it if 
>>> you look for it.
>>> 
>>> JanAnders
>>> 
>>> 3 feb 2013 kl. 09:17 skrev MarshaV <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> A Buddhist perspective of self:  No central unit, but a flow of mental 
>>>> states which rise, produce function and disappear, which gives rise to the 
>>>> next mental state producing a stream of mental states.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> In Buddhism there is the term 'anatta', no-self:
>>>> 
>>>> One cannot say that the self (I) exists.
>>>> One cannot say that the self (I) does not exist.
>>>> One cannot say that self (I) both exists and does not exist.
>>>> One cannot say that the self (I) neither exists nor does not exist.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Some MoQ quotes:
>>>> 
>>>> "An example of sammuti-sacca [conventional (relative) truth, or static 
>>>> quality] is the concept of self. Pirsig follows the Buddha’s teachings 
>>>> about the ‘self’ which doesn’t recognise that it has any real existence 
>>>> and that only ‘nothingness’ (i.e. Dynamic Quality) is thought to be real. 
>>>> According to Rahula, the Buddha taught that a clinging to the self as real 
>>>> is the primary cause of dukkha (which is usually translated as 
>>>> ‘suffering’).  Having said this, Rahula (1959, p.55) makes it very clear 
>>>> that it’s not incorrect to ‘use such expressions in our daily life as ‘I’, 
>>>> ‘you’, ‘being’, ‘individual’, etc’ as long as it is remembered that the 
>>>> self (like anything else conceptualised) is just a useful convention."
>>>> (McWatt, MoQ Textbook)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> "This fictitious 'man' has many synonyms; 'mankind,' 'people,' 'the 
>>>> public,' and even such pronouns as 'I,' 'he,' and 'they.' Our language is 
>>>> so organized around them and they are so convenient to use it is 
>>>> impossible to get rid of them. There is really no need to. Like 
>>>> 'substance' they can be used as long as it is remembered that they're 
>>>> terms for collections of patterns and not some independent primary reality 
>>>> of their own."
>>>>  (LILA, Chapter 12)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> "This Cartesian 'Me,' this autonomous little homunculus who sits behind 
>>>> our eyeballs looking out through them in order to pass judgment on the 
>>>> affairs of the world, is just completely ridiculous. This self-appointed 
>>>> little editor of reality is just an impossible fiction that collapses the 
>>>> moment one examines it. This Cartesian 'Me' is a software reality, not a 
>>>> hardware reality. This body on the left and this body on the right are 
>>>> running variations of the same program, the same 'Me,' which doesn't 
>>>> belong to either of them. The 'Me's' are simply a program format.
>>>> 
>>>> "Talk about aliens from another planet. This program based on 'Me's' and 
>>>> 'We's' is the alien. 'We' has only been here for a few thousand years or 
>>>> so. But these bodies that 'We' has taken over were around for ten times 
>>>> that long before 'We' came along. And the cells - my God, the cells have 
>>>> been around for thousands of times that long."
>>>> (LILA, Chapter 15)   
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> “The MOQ, as I understand it, denies any existence of a “self” that is 
>>>> independent of inorganic, biological, social or intellectual patterns. 
>>>> There is no “self” that contains these patterns. These patterns contain 
>>>> the self. This denial agrees with both religious mysticism and scientific 
>>>> knowledge. In Zen, there is reference to “big self” and “small self.” 
>>>> Small self is the patterns. Big self is Dynamic Quality."
>>>>   (RMP, Lila’s Child, Annotation 29)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> "It's important to remember that both science and Eastern religions regard 
>>>> "the individual" as an empty concept. It is literally a figure of speech. 
>>>> If you start assigning concrete reality to it, you will find yourself in a 
>>>> philosophic quandary".
>>>> (RMP, Lila’s Child, Annotattion 77)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> "The MOQ, like the Buddhists and the Determinists (odd bedfellows) says 
>>>> this “autonomous individual” is an illusion."
>>>>   (RMP, Copleston)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
>Moq_Discuss mailing list
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>Archives:
>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to