Hey x-man,

If I surrender my thinking to you or your authority ("Scientist David 
Deutsch"), you might, indeed accuse me of a lack of critical thinking skills.  
I have no use for a general consensus, and I choose who's words I admire:

“Therefore, poets do not 'fit' into society, not because a place is denied them 
but because they do not take their 'places' seriously. They openly see its 
roles as theatrical, its styles as poses, its clothing costumes, its rules 
conventional, its crises arranged, its conflicts performed and its metaphysics 
ideological.” 

      (Carse, James P., 'Finite and infinite Games'


Marsha 
 
 

On Mar 20, 2013, at 11:39 PM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote:

"Arguments aim to contribute knowledge, whereas explanations aim to contribute 
understanding.
Arguments and explanations largely resemble each other in rhetorical use. This 
is the cause of much difficulty in thinking critically about claims. There are 
several reasons for this difficulty."
 
"Explanatory power is the ability of a theory to effectively explain the 
subject matter it pertains to. One theory is sometimes said to have more 
explanatory power than another theory about the same subject matter if it 
offers greater predictive power. That is, if it offers more details about what 
we should expect to see, and what we should not."
 
"Explanatory power may also suggest that more details of causal relations are 
provided, or that more facts are accounted for. Scientist David Deutsch adds 
that a good theory is not just predictive and falsifiable (i.e. testable); a 
good explanation also provides specific details which fit together so tightly 
that it is difficult to change one detail without affecting the whole theory."
 
http://www.ted.com/talks/david_deutsch_a_new_way_to_explain_explanation.html
 
[Ron]
It's one thing to say that each one of us has their own interpretation of a 
given explanation but
it's quite another to say that one interpretation is as good as the next and 
imply that through
interpretive power no general consensus may be gained as to the most accurate 
interpretation
of a given philosophical work. What lends interpretive power is also that which 
lends explanatory
power.
A good interpretation provides specific details which fit together so tightly 
that it is difficult to
change one detail without affecting the whole theory.
 
 
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to