Hi Edward Tooste Edgren Of course you have to try to get to the Truth as close as you possibly can through doing as much falsification as possible. The science community should be ethicly bound to do this as much as they can. I think that at the moment under the influence of pressure to raise funds and vanity to get more recognition. scientists are more and more tempted to produce sloppy science. For example there is a whole farmaceutical industry depending on this kind of science. The more vague diagnosis, the more money to be made.
Greetings Eddo 2013/4/10 Edward Toste Edgren <[email protected]> > Greetings, > According to your reasoning Eddo, absolute truth exists, but we can > never know or verify it. I don't think this means that we shouldn't > strive to get as close as possible to it. > > > > On 4/9/13, Eddo Rats <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Joseph and all > > > > Absolut truth doesn't exist and the illusion of an absolut truth is > always > > a dogmatic truth. In science no truth is absolute. Because the only way > you > > can prove an absolute truth is to falsify on every location always and > > that's practical undoable. > > > > Truth morals and culture are always relative to the context that you > > already are. > > > > Pure experience is a sensation you like or not or somewhere in between. > > Even a bacteria in a petrie dish can show that. > > The moment you start to give meaning to that sensation, you are creating > a > > definition of information which can change on a scale of very dynamic to > > very static in reference to what you subconsciously already are. > > > > First cause is the sensation you felt after the first spank on your bum > > that your mum gave you after you were born. > > > > Greetings Eddo > > > > > > 2013/4/9 Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> > > > >> Hi Marsha and All, > >> > >> The Absolute Truth! The metaphysical description of reality, including > >> the > >> indefinable, embraces more than the description of the physics base of > >> mathematical logic. > >> > >> How do I experience the indefinable? > >> > >> What do you mean by "absolute truth"? Is absolute beyond the > indefinable > >> and not considered in Metaphysics DQ/SQ? > >> > >> DQ/SQ accepts the indefinable. Is it your contention that DQ is outside > >> the > >> reality of consciousness? I agree a first cause for Absolute Truth is > >> indefinable. > >> > >> On 4/8/13 2:08 PM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > And I certainly find it hard to believe you mind being obscure. What > >> > to > >> do > >> > with consciousness is also interesting and deserving a good story. I > >> don't > >> > believe the intellectual (static) MoQ is suppose to represent the > >> Absolute > >> > Truth: > >> > >> > >> Moq_Discuss mailing list > >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > >> Archives: > >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > >> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
