>>>> djh: >>>> Marsha will actively claim that she doesn't care about what folks (in >>>> particular dmb) think.. >>> Marsha: >>> What I said was that dmb is not my moral or intellectual compass. I am >>> interested everyone's opinion, but do not find dmb's analogy more >>> significant than anyone else's. >> djh: >> A quick search of the archives here for the phrase "I don't care what you >> think." - except for three messages - all the rest (fourteen) are from you >> (or repeats of something you've written) to someone else. >> This lack of care for intellectual patterns of folks on here results in a >> lack of change or improvement of your opinion. As said previously - it's >> ironic, considering your definition of static patterns includes the term of >> 'ever-changing'. > Marsha: > You didn't offer the context, so I don't know if the statements extracted > from your search pertain to dmb or intellectual patterns, so let me put it > like this: I don't care (to be concerned or solicitous; have thought or > regard.) what dmb thinks. As I stated, dmb is not my moral or intellectual > compass. I am _interested_ (curious) in everyone's opinion, but that does > not mean that I must accept those opinion's. As for intellectual patterns, I > am tremendously _interested_ in intellectual patterns, but feel no need to be > attached to them.
djh: What does context matter? If you actively claim to not care about what someone thinks, then this is ugly and low quality not matter the context. Even if you disagree with someone, the act of disagreeing is a form of caring pretending otherwise is just ugly. As stated previously, you misunderstand non-attachment to patterns as a simple change in mindset - a change in mindset that involves thinking static patterns are 'ever-changing'. But this change of mindset isn't non-attachment - it's just an easy excuse to not care about intellectual patterns and their fundamentally static nature. Dmb's right; you do play games. You play games by undercutting every intellectual disagreement people have with you by just not caring about what they're saying and pass this rejection off as some kind of Mystical insight. This doesn't result in Dynamic Quality but as a result of your lack of care for the static nature of static patterns - chaos. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
