Dmb,


"Pirsig uses the term ‘subject-object metaphysics’ (SOM) for any metaphysics 
(explicitly or implicitly) that perceives reality as either mind and/or matter 
such as idealism, materialism, and dualism. This recognition is not unique to 
Pirsig as, for instance, the Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy also notes that 
‘a subject-object dichotomy is acknowledged in most Western traditions’."
   (MoQ Textbook)  


"In the MOQ, nothing exists prior to the observation. The observation creates 
the intellectual patterns called “observed” and “observer.”

   (LILA's Child', Annotation 65)

Cannot help but wonder about the knower and the known, or the observer and the 
observed?   Has this dualist perspective vanished into a cloud of pretty 
rhetorical terms such as elegance, consistency and coherence, and what of 
phrases like "DQ chooses" and "SOM thinks"?  Very pretty paraphrasing of few 
quotes, but is the intellectual level nothing more than rhetoric?  

Marsha said:
Cannot help but wonder about the knower and the known, or the observer and the 
observed?   Has this dualist perspective vanished into a cloud of pretty 
rhetorical terms such as elegance, consistency and coherence, and what of 
phrases like "DQ chooses" and "SOM thinks"?  Very pretty paraphrasing of few 
quotes, but is the intellectual level nothing more than rhetoric?


dmb says:


"Lightning hits!    Quality! Virtue! Dharma! That is what the Sophists were 
teaching! Not ethical relativism. Not pristine "virtue." But areté. Excellence. 
Dharma! Before the Church of Reason. Before substance. Before form. Before mind 
and matter. Before dialectic itself. Quality had been absolute. Those first 
teachers of the Western world were teaching Quality, and the medium they had 
chosen was that of rhetoric. He has been doing it right all along."


The comments and quotes simply name SOME of the marks of intellectual quality, 
of the art of rationality or the art of rhetoric. It's a partial list of what's 
right when you write artfully. That's why the quotes and comments are riddled 
with terms like....


...personal, heartfelt, coherently structured, and precise.  ...analogies and 
metaphors as much as logic and empirical evidence.  ...elegance and not 
sloppiness, precision and not vagueness, clarity and not confusion, definable 
terms and not made up or arbitrary meanings. Truth must have logical 
consistency and not incoherence, economy of explanation and not verbose, 
rambling drivel, and  agreement with experience. Metaphysical ideas "must be 
divisible, definable and knowable". "Definitions are the FOUNDATION of reason. 
You can't reason without them." ...DQ  is "the value-force that chooses an 
elegant mathematical solution to a laborious one, or a brilliant experiment 
over a confusing, inconclusive one" and guides the selection of beautiful ideas 
over clumsy and clunky notions.

That's just a fraction of the things Pirsig has said about intellect. One of 
his central aims, if not the most important one of all, is a root expansion of 
rationality. By equating his conception of intellectual quality with SOM, you 
have certainly missed the point of his work in a very big way.  


Marsha:
No more than you missing the point of my post.  I appreciate that you have a 
favored way of interpreting the MoQ, but there should be no need for others to 
be constrained by your perspective. 

"Unlike subject-object metaphysics the Metaphysics of Quality does not insist 
on a single exclusive truth."
 
And this:

"Static quality patterns are dead when they are exclusive, when they demand 
blind obedience and suppress Dynamic change. But static patterns, nevertheless, 
provide a necessary stabilizing force to protect Dynamic progress from 
degeneration. Although Dynamic Quality, the Quality of freedom, creates this 
world in which we live, these patterns of static quality, the quality of order, 
preserve our world. Neither static nor Dynamic Quality can survive without the 
other."

Marsha:
While I agree with this entire paragraph, I ask you to consider carefully the 
first sentence.  Your perspective, assertions and opinions are not to be taken 
as Scripture.
 

Marsha
 
  
 
 
 





Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to