dmb,
“Upon this first, and in one sense this sole, rule of reason, that in order to
learn you must desire to learn, and in so desiring not be satisfied with what
you already incline to think, there follows one corollary which itself deserves
to be inscribed upon every wall of the city of philosophy: Do not block the way
of inquiry."
Peirce, C. S., Reasoning and the Logic of Things: Lecture Four - First
Rule of Logic
On Aug 19, 2013, at 4:55 PM, david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Ian said to Arlo:
> Rather than working the definition of SOMism to death, I'm asking what does
> MoQish expression and argument have, that distinguishes it from SOMist
> expression and argument. What I do say is that objective, scientistic,
> definitional logic does necessarily privilege well-defined subjects and
> objects and well defined relations between these and is a feature of SOMist
> intellectual expression and argument. Pragmatically, MoQish argumentation
> also uses these, but it is MORE THAN these.
>
>
>
> dmb says:
> I think it's quite clear ...
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
