If, nothing is right or wrong and how I behave is simply a matter
of my personal history and I can not be judged by it, I should
have every right to say and behave anyway I wish and not be
held responsible for it right? One persons threatening abusive
behaviour is anothers witty and colorful dialoge, I mean, abusivness
and hostility are just opinions right?
To hold this point of view and to accuse people of ad hominum attacks
and straw men tactics would be pretty damn hypocritical since they destroy
their own basis for civility right? they have no right what so ever to judge
anything said as abusive, dishonest, threatening or false. If they infact
believed what they say they believe everything anyone would ever say
or do would be acceptable. Right?
Am I wrong to illustrate my point by employing this philosophy?
If contributers are allowed to assert this point of view as "true" of the MoQ
Then why would it be unacceptable to employ this point of view as true
of the MoQ? Why would putting this belief into practice be wrong?
..
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
