Wow, Joe, I'm moved to say absolutely. I agree. See my most recent blog post today - but in essence, the objective logic of "science" cannot cope with the reality of DQ - truly radical empiricism is before objectification and hence beyond scientific logic.
Ian. On 7 Oct 2013 20:49, "Joseph Maurer" <jh...@comcast.net> wrote: > Hi David M and All, > > Modern science owes a great debt to the rigid logic in mathematics. > Mathematics can only describe definable SQ. > > DQ is indefinable, outside a purview of mathematical structure. This > explains the need for the reality of DQ/SQ metaphysics in the further > discernment of reality beyond the logic in mathematics. > > Joe > > > On 10/7/13 8:10 AM, "David Morey" <david...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: > > > Great, now my proposal is that we then accept that percepts contain > > regularities and patterns, can we not measure percepts, is that not > what > > science does? This is why MOQ can embrace science and realism but reject > SOM, > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html