On 10/22/13 5:16 PM, "David Buchanan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> dmb says: > You GUESS my thesis is full of confirmation bias? That's hilarious. Maybe you > ought to read it before you use it to confirm your bias. Hilarious. [Dave] I thought you would enjoy that! But just for grins try rereading "The One and the Many." there James covers a much wider spectrum of "monism's" than in "Monistic Idealism" or "Hegel and his Methods" Where he says: "The regular mystical way of attaining the vision of the One is by ascetic training, fundamentally the same in all religious systems. But this ineffable kind of Oneness is not strictly philosophical, for philosophy is essentially talkative and explicit, so I must pass it by." Me too! Some time ago I went to your university site but I didn't find it. Then I said, "What the hell, why bother, it's bound to be more of the same stuff, in line with what you post here." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
