On 10/25/13 11:24 AM, "David Buchanan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Like I just said, Mao is obviously a SOMer and Pirsig's "direct experience" is > what you get after you've rejected SOM. Their meanings are not just > distinguishable from each other, they are features of two completely different > metaphysics. [Dave] So what both you are saying in flurry of sand is that neither "direct experience" nor "intellectual abstractions" have any plain English definitions. Because once you reject SOM, SOM (plain English) words and definitions are meaningless under the MoQ. You're claiming Pirsig's work is LITERALLY incomparable to any other works of philosophy, except of course by dedicated "Pirsigians" like you who though zazen, peyote, and other self induced mystical experiences parse their true meaning. In other words a: "Metaphysic of Insanity" Pirsig said that somewhere. I should have listened. Dave Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
