Andre,

> On Oct 28, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Andre <and [email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Marsha to Andre:
> I not only agree with Mark that language is a kind of prison, but I also 
> think patterns are a kind of prison.
> "To the extent that one's behavior is controlled by static patterns of 
> quality it is without choice. But to the extent that one follows Dynamic 
> Quality, which is undefinable, one's behavior is free." [LILA}
> 
> Marsha now: Yes, in this context it fits well.
> 
> Andre:
> Do you have any other contexts in mind than 'this' one? The statement is a 
> very general one and I wonder if you have something else in mind. To be 
> suspicious, I wonder if you have something else 'up your sleeve'Lucy?.
> 
> The reason I am asking is because I am convinced that you do not take spov's 
> (in general) serious because, as you assert, they are 'like an illusion'.


Marsha:  
I take all static patterns of value as seriously as burnt umber, light red, 
yellow ochre, cadmium yellow, cadmium scarlet, permanent rose, alizarin red, 
winsor violet, french ultramarine, thalo blue, thalo green, olive green and 
titanium.  Your suspicions, on the other hand, I do not take seriously at all.  
 Your suspicions and misinterpretations are not my concern, they are thoughts 
flittering through your mind.  

snip... 

 
 
Marsha
 
 
 
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to