> On Oct 27, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > > dmb to DT: > Sorry, but I am sick to death of watching hacks blame Pirsig for their own > confusion. The MOQ is definable and knowable and the whole thing is built of > words and concepts. Obviously, discussing his work (or anyone else's) > requires us to bring some linguistic tools and skills to task. It also > demands intellectual honesty so that people respond to the actual claims of > others without reversing, ignoring or distorting them. > > Andre: > I share your frustration dmb and it seems to me that despite Pirsig's MoQ > some posters/lurkers are so trapped in SOM that they really, absolutely > cannot find their way through the words/concepts used. They are still seen as > a prison... as 'Marsha' does.
Marsha: Proof? Or, or like dmb, is one expected to accept what you say because it reflects a pattern flittering through your mind: incomplete, conditioned, thinking; biases, emotional, prejudices, preferences, habit; your own particular reactions to words and concepts. I don't think so... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
