"Consciousness can be described is a process of defining Dynamic Quality. But
once the definitions emerge, they are static patterns and no longer apply to
Dynamic Quality."
(RMP,'LILA's Child').
Greetings,
I cannot see where that brush with consciousness does not point to a known and
knower no matter what it is labeled? There is a debate with Buddhism whether
this split is innate or learned with our first breath. How would this not
apply to all levels of static patterns? When you look at the door, do you not
see it as separate from you? Or do you experience the door as a series of
moments that result from eye-consciousness and mind-consciousness? And what of
justice? How easy is it to get beyond this natural tendency, the dualistic
habit? Are you a Buddha yet?
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
