David Morey said to dmb:
Thanks Dave that is great,  George's Grammars of Creation is ...an interesting 
work that could, given an open mind, help develop the MOQ beyond some of its 
self-imposed limitations as I see it. Of course,  George has also written about 
Heidegger as an alternative opponent of SOM so he is well aware of SOM 
problematics,  but like me he thinks that post-SOM thinking does not imply some 
sort of positivist prison of experience,  no matter how important it is to 
recognise what it is that we do and do not actually experience.


Andre replied:
Lie 'beyond' experience?  ...It would appear, as you phrase it, that the MoQ 
has 'self-imposed limitations' and that there must be something lying beyond 
it. Which limitations of the MoQ are you thinking of David? And what could be 
lying 'beyond' the MoQ?



dmb says:
I don't see what the problem is either. Morey never explains why there is this 
supposed need to "develop the MOQ beyond some of its self-imposed limitations". 
 And when he finally gets around to naming this "self imposed limitation," it 
turns out to be a "positivist prison of experience". 

Apparently, Morey has confused the MOQ's radical empiricism with positivism or 
traditional sensory empiricism. Google those terms along with moq and dmb and 
you'll see that I've already posted on this topic hundreds of times - an you'll 
see how they are not at all the same thing. 

"The MOQ not only PASSES the logical positivists' tests for meaningfulness, it 
passes them with the highest marks. The MOQ RESTATES the empirical basis of 
logical positivism with more precision, more inclusiveness, more explanatory 
power than it has previously had. It says that values are not outside of the 
experience that logical positivism limits itself to. They are the ESSENCE of 
the experience. Values are MORE empirical, in fact, than subjects or objects." 
(LILA, p66. Emphasis is Pirsig's in the original.)

"The MOQ would show how things become enormously more coherent -- FABULOUSLY 
more coherent - when you start wiht an assumption that Quality is the primary 
empirical reality of the world.... ...but showing that, of course, was a very 
big job. ..." (LILA, 67)




                                          
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to