Don't know Auxier, but that is entertaining. Thanks John.
Ian

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:39 PM, John Carl <ridgecoy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "... pragmatists in the James-Dewey temper will have to learn
> *difficult*philosophy, something they have successfully avoided doing
> for about three
> generations, through disinclination, dullness of mind, and uninformed
> superstitions about the role of reason in philosophy.  The inheritors of
> the James and Dewey temper, however, are such as to believed, quite
> dogmatically, that all metaphysics is bad metaphysics--and here we have a
> nice examples among them of the methods of tenacity, authority and the a
> priori method , which is what they have done in fixing their beliefs about
> the matter.  Hence, they neither read nor understand Royce, nor Whitehead,
> nor anyone else who is difficult to understand, and the often dislike
> Peirce and do not understand him, even though they have developed a
> conscience about forcing themselves to read him, once.
>
> Asking contemporary pragmatists to reconsider metaphysics is recieve as
> though one had asked them to go to church to get a little religion, an
> affront to any respectable intellectual these days, especially the
> followers of Dewey and James.  They would rather go to hell than learn
> logic and try some metaphysics.  But most of them have done some
> metaphysics badly, and fail to grasp the situation until they feel Rorty's
> pointy nominalistic trident poking their collective behinds."
>
> Time Will and Purpose, Auxier, 120
>
> I bet ol' Matt Kundert would get a kick out of that.
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to