Hi Ian,

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Ian Glendinning
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Don't know Auxier, but that is entertaining. Thanks John.
> Ian
>
>
Randall E. Auxier is a scholar, writer and philosopher with few peers, in
my personal pantheon.  I'm also honored to consider him a friend as he
stayed at my place for 2 weeks while giving public lectures on Royce in
Grass Valley.  I'm loving his most recent book that I just quoted.  Here's
another snippet that is right on.

"Human beings are going to be religious.  The issue is not *whether* human
beings will believe in God (they will) but rather *how* they will
conceptualize that belief.  It is irresponsible of philosophers in the
academy to think themselves above taking "God" seriously.  If anything is
clear in the present century, it is that the world's troubles are greatly
tied to how persons (beyond the academy) are at one another's throats over
how rightly to think about God, and many are willing to kill and die for
one concept rather than another.  To treat this struggle as
sub-philosophical is to abdicate the responsibility of philosophy to the
world.

And many, probably most academic philosophers have abdicated.  It is
treason against philosophy and a betrayal of of the wider world to to
refuse to engage the issues that divide the world.  ...

Our task is to do whatever we can to promote sane and peaceful dialogue
about such ideas and the more difficult the idea, the greater the
challenge.  It is difficult to imagine a more challenging task that to help
in bringing about a better understanding of the idea of God in the
present.  We can do better."

ibid. 128
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to