Hi Ant, I’m not so sure about this because static quality could be considered a definition of Good. To me it’s somewhat the opposite in that 'SOM is a Metaphysics which claims that their are either subjetcs and/or objects and fails to include Quality in its correct metaphysical place as the source of all things’. In other words while both define quality - SOM’s defnition is metaphysically below Subjects and Objects and thus in the incorrect place.
Just a thought. -David > On 27 Nov 2014, at 7:24 am, Ant McWatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear all!, > > Nice to be back! Anyway, I was thinking recently (after last month's MOQ > lecture at Liverpool University) that a definition of SOM might be "any > metaphysics that, implicitly or explicitly, DEFINES the Good". Any sensible > thoughts about this definition and how it might be improved will be > appreciated. > > Ant > > > . > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
