Struan Hellier wrote:
> Greetings,
Right back at you.
> Jonathan: Very diplomatic, well done.
You should take lessons.
> The truth is that the majority (not all) of individual
> postings have been utter crap and the overall debate has degenerated > > because of
>it.
How childish. If my teenagers came to me with such criticism, I'd send
them on their way with a good scolding:-(
> If my undergraduates came out with this sort of rubbish I would have
> them rusticated without further ado.
No doubt happier for the experience. I smell a pedant. Lighten up.
Your undergrads must love you. Judging by your cyber-persona, I can
imagine the treatment one of your students with the temerity to advance
an opinion with which you disagree must receive.
For someone as obviously intelligent as you, I can't really believe that
you don't know the effect you create with your Brit headmaster
affectation.
Remember - just a spoonfull of sugar, etc.
One of the advantages of the MD over its more structured counterpart is
the chaotic environment. A little guidance, rather than a sweeping
criticism that illuminates nothing, may go a long way toward the goal
of defining the MOQ, don't you think?
> Save some room on the passenger seat before I leap lemming like out of
> the window.
So leap.
Good day.
MOQ Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
