my understanding of pirsig's morality is that it had to do more with
the direction between the levels, not the dynamic nature. a shooting
spree is very dynamic, but not very moral. no?
Shalom
David Lind
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Glover wrote:
> David Lind wrote:
> >
> > Dan Glover wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Dave
> > >
> > > In modern warfare, means justify ends. In as much as Truman was faced
> > > with ending WWII as expediently as possible I still believe he chose
> > > Dynamically and therefore morally when he ordered dropped atomic bombs
> > > on Japan, if circumstances of that time are considered. It's all part
of
> > > giving "The Devil" his due, I suppose. If Truman looked to God for
> > > answers, it was The Devil who responded.
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> >
> > okay...i'm confused. to act dynamically is to act morally?
> > something seems amiss about this.
>
> Hi David
>
> Pirsig's moral hierarchy would seem to indicate this, no?
>
>
> MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
> MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
