As for Pirsig's statements being true or not, I take it for granted that his description of Dynamic Quality is true because he invented the concept for his metaphysics. You are free, of course, to described Dynamic Quality in whatever way you wish. It's just not Pirsig's MOQ. --- are we talking moq or pirsigs moq? maybe we should keep all scientific talk to the level of the ancient greeks??? regards rich MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- MD The Faces of Quality rich pretti
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality diana
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality Platt Holden
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality Richard Edgar
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality Platt Holden
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality Richard Edgar
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality Platt Holden
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality Richard Edgar
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality David L Thomas
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality Richard Edgar
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality David L Thomas
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality Richard Edgar
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality Platt Holden
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality David L Thomas
- Re: MD The Faces of Quality Dan Glover
- MD (Truth = Quality)? jc
- RE: MD (Truth = Quality)? Brian Chamberlin
- MD A very safe position. Richard Edgar
