Diana said:

>I haven't succeeded because I can't do it on my own because I have several
>problems with Pirsig's philosophy that I'm unable to resolve without
>discussing it with others, and I have been unable to get anyone else to 
>focus
>on these questions. If you choose to ignore my efforts that's up to you,
>but please don't try to make out that you are the only one

First: I do not believe, nor am I trying to swashbuckle you into thinking, 
that I am the only one attempting to outlay P's ideas in a complete, clear 
and point by point fashion. Really, now. I can't do it on my own, nor you, 
and probably not anyone else. So let's all love each other.

Second: I recall when I first joined the discussion here, it was about 
Mary's query on how to best present the MOQ - whether to one group, one 
person, or another. At that time, you, as did I, laid down some "dogmatic" 
statements about the MOQ. We were in near perfect agreement. Good. Bad thing 
is, the month ended, and any "universal" coherent picture of the MOQ was put 
aside - at least on the website, it seems.

So, I in no way ignored your attempt(s). I like them. I liked mine and 
others', too. But the important point is that I have yet to read a - again, 
now - POINT BY POINT - logical, clear, consistent, blah blah blah 
formulation of P's ideas and certain problems or platypi that come up in 
trying to understand it.

In that case, I suggest we devise some simple expandable -quantifying- 
system in which form we can put clear ideas. For example, a file could be 
put on the website, which has main points and problems, clearly labelled, 
for all to agree or disagree with - but we would at last be discussing on 
some common, foundational basis. We could all refer to openly accessible 
intellectual values.

Meaning, say: "I disagree with (Principle, Arche, Axiom, Whatever) # 2, or 
letter X, subsection iii, for the following reasons: a, b and c. then the 
next person can refer to specific arguments which inevitably will come up in 
any prolonged discussion of the MOQ. Also, lurkers and newcomers might 
appreciate it.

Obvious reply: I don't have time. Neither do I at the moment, nor am I 
computer-literate beyond the keyboard. If five or six people even would 
really like to try to make this idea work, then I promise I'll work hard as 
soon as exams are done in a couple months. Maybe it'll strike everyone as a 
static, sucky egg of an idea. That's okay.

Gotta go.

Rich




______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Reply via email to