TO: Platt, Jon, Struan, Horse, David B. and Rick

From: Roger


JON wrote: 
“I agree with Rick and Horse. Since everything is value, WE must 
automatically sense value first.”

DAVID B wrote:
“I think Pirsig is just saying that reality is something that happens before 
you 
have a chance to think about it. And it seems that he’s even saying that 
experience of value even precedes the transmission of raw sensory data, 
which is more like a result of the primary experience. That’s how Pirsig’s 
Radical Empiricism is different that the empiricism of Kant or the other 
modern epistemologists. They were talking about sensory data and the way 
OUR MINDS shape it, but Pirsig is talking about experience in a broader 
sense. 
It’s hard to talk about this stuff, but it seems “experience” as a product 
of the 
PHYSICAL SENSES is very much a SOM conception and the MOQ’s sense of 
“experience” is about an event that occurs before the senses are activated, 
if 
you will.”[Emphasis added by Roger]

ROGER comments:
I am not sure if I am offering a different view, or just stating it 
differently, but my interpretation of Pirsig and James (Radical Empiricism) 
is that ...

Pure experience or value is the essence or base of reality.  Consciousness 
and external reality, subject and object, internal and external are derived 
from this pure experience.  Therefore, value is the dynamic reality which is 
then divided (or in James words,"counted twice over") into subject and 
object. 

I just want to clarify or highlight that "we" and "our minds" and our 
"physical senses" are also derived from the Quality Event. After initially 
writing this, I have since noticed that Struan just provided one of the 
quotes of Pirsig's that basically ends with the same thing. (Though if I am 
not mistaken, the quote is from ZMM and Struan has edited out all narrative 
parts )

[PIRSIG]"Quality is not a thing. It is an event. It is the event at which the 
subject becomes
aware of the object. And because without objects there can be no subject, 
quality is the event at
which awareness of both subjects and objects is made possible. Quality is not 
just the result of a
collision between subject and object. The very existence of subject and 
object themselves is deduced
from the Quality event. The Quality event is the cause of the subjects and 
objects, which are then
mistakenly presumed to be the cause of the Quality!"

I plan to respond directly to Struan on his commentary of the above in my 
next post.

Rog

PS -- Platt, I am almost done with Nonzero.  Very interesting book.


MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Reply via email to