Greetings,
Platt. I fear you do not understand what you are talking about and therefore have come
to some
fallacious conclusions about me. The problem is that you do not know what logic is. I
hope you will
by the end of this posting.
PLATT:
"�You demonstrably can have a universe without a human being - check the
fossil record if you don�t believe me.�
. . . and then compared what you consider this indisputable truth to the
following quote from your hero:
�There is no logical impossibility in the view that the world was created five
minutes ago, complete with memories and records. That may seem an
improbable hypothesis, but it is not logically refutable.�
Seems your �empirical proof� of an independent reality is logically-challenged."
I REPLY:
You are conflating logic with empirical evidence. They are very different things.
'Demonstrably' in this context clearly means empirical evidence - i.e. 'go and check
the fossil
record.' This is known variously as 'a posteriori,' or, 'empirical,' or, 'matters of
fact.' In other
words, one uses one's senses to ascertain the veracity of a hypothesis. In still other
words, the
scientific METHOD. This is not in the least concerned (at this level) with logic, as
logic is 'a
priori' understanding, or, from Hume, concerned with 'relations of ideas.'
Now look at the second quote you provide. That there is no 'logical impossibility'
means that it is
logically consistent to hold the view. WHETHER THIS CAN BE BACKED UP BY EMPIRICAL
EVIDENCE IS
ANOTHER QUESTION ENTIRELY. It does not require empirical evidence to establish its
veracity. Key
sentence coming up:
Russell is not denying the CONSISTENCY of the said view, he is merely denying the
INFERENCE. I, on
the other hand, was denying the INFERENCE. If that didn't make sense to you, I implore
you to look
up the terms, 'a priori' and, 'a posteriori.'
Now, answer the question. Which is the odd one out? a) 2+2=4. b) A bachelor is an
unmarried man. c)
My cat is black.
If you can't do it, may I suggest any good introductory book to philosophy. It is hard
to overstate
the importance of this distinction for anyone seeking to understand almost any
philosophical
position.
And finally, for goodness sake, Platt, don't take me for a complete twat, I do have
some idea of
what I'm on about and I promise that you will fail miserably if you try to put me off
with utterly
unfounded insults and crass accusations like the one which prefaced your previous
posting.
I'm off to bed. Goodnight.
Struan
------------------------------------------
Struan Hellier
< mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"All our best activities involve desires which are disciplined and
purified in the process."
(Iris Murdoch)
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
