some good posts on that topic. It might be that we underestimate subjectivity in this, though. i have to admit that on more than one occasion, I've read a past paper, or indeed a past post (of my own), and realised that what had seemed so clear and obvious to me when I happened to be completely immersed in a subject, seems impenetrable at another time. In fact, apart from David (Prince)'s examples of when people are trying not to communicate, or are actually trying to communicate something else entirely (usually "status transactions"), I think there are many examples of good old incompetance, which may have nothing to do with malevolent intent! cheers Peter Lennox Hardwick House tel: (0114) 2661509 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or:- [EMAIL PROTECTED] MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
