----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 2:11 AM
Subject: Re: MD Re:MEMES
> Your question goes straight to the heart of the MOQ and of Niels Bohr's
> framework of complementarity. We might say Dynamic Quality is the
> evolutionary motor yet one we cannot conceive of. We might say Dynamic
> Quality is God but not a God we can talk to or pray to or imagine in any
> way at all. The harmony we see all around us is our own static quality
> harmony and not the harmony of God; of Dynamic Quality. There is nothing
> at all that can be said of Dynamic Quality without disturbing it into
> something else. If you haven't yet, you should read the Subjects,
> Objects, Data and Values paper. That answers your question quite well,
> much better than I am able to.
<< Of what we know nothing, we don 't talk !! >>
Wittgenstein...
Regards,
Kenneth
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
